|
 |
CPD Media Monitors follow the development of critical public diplomacy stories in world media. Current Media Monitors feature regularly updated news coverage from a variety of national and international sources on topical stories. The aggregated content is later reviewed and analyzed to produce a Media Monitor Report. The Reports organize media coverage by source, region or topic and provide a synopsis of its main public diplomacy implications.CPD Media Monitors do not intend to assess or comment on the accuracy of media reporting but to provide a representative survey of how various media are framing the coverage of the issues under review.
Current Media Monitors
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE NEXT U.S. ADMINISTRATION
March 1, 2008 - Present
This Media Monitor tracks reports and media commentary that provide recommendations for the next U.S. president related to U.S. Public Diplomacy.
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND THE UNITED STATES LEGISLATURE
September 15, 2008 - Present
This Media Monitor tracks coverage of U.S. House and Senate bills, resolutions, and hearings related to American Public Diplomacy.
AFRICOM: AMERICA'S PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN AFRICA
June 24, 2007 - Present
This CPD Media Monitor tracks the public diplomacy mandate of the United States' newest military command in Africa, AFRICOM. Updated regularly, the Monitor provides a window into the local African as well as the global perspective on the subject.
Latest Media Monitor Reports
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND THE BEIJING OLYMPICS: NARRATIVES AND COUNTER NARRATIVES
OCT 8, 2008
By Meg Young
This CPD Media Monitor Report provides an overview of media coverage of events surrounding the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in Beijing, China. The report is intended to highlight narrative differences between Chinese press and international English language press.
Past Media Monitor Reports
U.S. TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES IN CHINA: CONTROVERSY, LEGISLATION, & IMPLICATIONS FOR CORPORATE DIPLOMACY
JUN 28, 2006
By Jade Miller
Over the past two years, Cisco, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google have entered the Chinese Internet market, providing online or information-related products utilized by the Chinese government to enforce Chinese information censorship laws, conduct online surveillance, and restrict access by Chinese citizens to certain internet sites. Public outcries against these IT companies first emerged in the blogosphere and among human rights organizations. Editorial and op-ed pieces in the mainstream news media soon followed, reaching critical mass in the Fall of 2005.
THE DANISH CARTOON CRISIS: THE IMPORT AND IMPACT OF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
APR 5, 2006
By Shawn Powers
In early September 2005, Flemming Rose, the culture editor for a right-of-center Danish newspaper, commissioned over 30 Danish cartoonists to submit caricatures of the Islamic prophet Mohammed that he could print in his paper, Jyllands-Posten. Rose had recently become concerned that European media organizations were self-censoring themselves with regard to issues sensitive to Islam, and was worried that the principles of freedom of speech were under attack. On September 30, with the intent of “pushing back self-imposed limits on expression that seemed to be closing in tighter,” Rose published twelve cartoons depicting the Islamic prophet Mohammed, images that are considered blasphemous by followers of Islam.
THE DUBAI PORTS CONTROVERSY: AN UPROAR HEARD ROUND THE WORLD
MAR 22, 2006
By Jade Miller
Dubai-based Dubai Ports World (DP World) announced its takeover of P & O, a British shipping and logistics company on February 13 to little fanfare. Coverage of the $3.7 billion deal was restricted mainly to the business section of international news sources, if it was covered at all. Almost none of these outlets made mention of the transfer of management of six U.S. ports from P&O to DP World included in the deal. Only when Senator Charles Schumer spearheaded a high-profile campaign against the deal, did wide spread objections begin to surface.
Previous posts « First < 1 2 3 4 5 > Last »
|
|
|
SEND TO FRIENDS
