University of Southern California
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY BLOG
INSIDE NEWSWIRE

SendSEND TO FRIENDS


Main Page | Month Archive | Email Updates | RSS Feed | Print Version

The Public Diplomacy Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars, researchers, practitioners and professionals from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School.



AN EDITOR’S OPINION ON OP-EDS
FEB 26, 2006 - 11:01PM PDT
Posted by Robert A. Berger
All posts by this author

For 20 years I was editor of the Op-Ed page of the Los Angeles Times. I thought I tried to maintain balance on the page, but of course some would disagree that I did so.

I never, never would have published an article by John Yoo, the Justice Department’s author of critical underpinnings for the legal case supporting torture at Guantanamo and other such extraordinary violations of international law effected by the Bush administration. (See the recent article by Jane Mayer in The New Yorker). The current management of the Times has published several of Yoo’s Op-Eds without compunction.

It’s an interesting question: Which regime at the Times Op-Ed better upheld principles of journalism? The “Limited Open Door” of today? Or the “There are bright lines we do not cross” of my era?

I defend my own approach, of course. Before you endorse the page’s current approach as demonstrating openness to a wider range of views -- and I’m certainly not saying that all views from the left are excluded these days -- recall that Robert Scheer’s column was dropped from the Times, a move hardly justified by his quality of his insights into this misbegotten war.

John Yoo and his views of the law have done incalculable damage to the standing of this nation in the world. The notion of public diplomacy has been removed from the roster of tools available to this nation because all the world now knows what this nation stands for and how far it will go beyond the bounds of accepted behavior. The rule of law no longer applies in our relations with other nations, and it no longer applies in our handling of combatants.

An Op-Ed page, out of respect for principles of balance, should not give voice to this sort of descent into Hades.
 
Read Comments (0) | Add Your Own

- - -

Read Comments:

No comments for this entry.

- - -

Add a Comment:

Your Name:

Your Email:

Comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

NOTE: Your comment may not post immediately.

*
*
* Public Diplomacy Blog
* CPD Media Monitors
* CPD Announcements
* CPD in the News
* Past Media Reviews Archive
* RSS Feeds
* *
*

REGIONS
Africa
Americas
Asia Pacific
South Asia
Middle East
Europe


BLOGROLL
Abu Aardvark
Brand Horizons
Chasing the Flame
CMD PR Watch
CPD/FPA Election
Demos
DipNote
Diplo Foundation
Diplomacia Publica (Spain)
East West Views
FCO Bloggers:Global Conversations
Global Interdependence Initiative Switchblog
Institute for Cultural Diplomacy
John Brown’s Public Diplomacy Press and Blog Review
Julkisussdiplomatia
Kim Andrew Elliott
Layalina Review
Mountain Runner
Public Affairs (Germany)
Simon Anholt's Placeblog
The Language Business
Undiplomatic
Wandren PD
World Politics Review

- - -
- - -

Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

XML     

- - -
USC Center on Public Diplomacy logo Back to Top
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
Home | About the Center | Newsroom | Center Projects | Library | For Students
*
Search | Contact Us | Privacy Policy   ©2008 USC Center on Public Diplomacy. All rights reserved.