University of Southern California
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
PUBLIC DIPLOMACY BLOG
INSIDE NEWSWIRE

SendSEND TO FRIENDS


Main Page | Month Archive | Email Updates | RSS Feed | Print Version

The Public Diplomacy Blog is intended to stimulate dialog among scholars, researchers, practitioners and professionals from around the world in the public diplomacy sphere. The opinions represented here are the authors' own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy at the Annenberg School.



FACING RESOURCE NATIONALISTS WITH A CLEAR, CREDIBLE PUBLIC DIPLOMACY
SEP 28, 2006 - 1:41PM PDT
Posted by Craig Hayden
All posts by this author

Joshua Kurlantzick, in "Can Public Diplomacy Counter Resource Nationalism?," paints a rather alarming geo-strategic picture for the United States. The recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization showcased the warming relations between oil-rich Iran and Russia with the budding super-consumer, China.

Kurlantzick argues that these nations, along with Venezuela and Bolivia, constitute a nascent alliance of authoritarian regimes united not so much by ideology, but in their opposition to the United States. They represent a resurgance of "resource nationalism" not seen since the early 20th century.

Kurlantzick goes to great lengths to show how increased coordination between these nations herald problems for the United States. To forestall this future, he offers two basic strategies for the U.S. -- peel China away from the authoritarian oil producers, and engage in more vigorous value-driven public diplomacy.

This last point is understandably short in this essay, yet Kurlantzick's short treatment of PD raises some important questions. He cites Julia Sweig's study for the Council on Foreign Relations, that showed U.S. support for democratic institution building yielded significant gains in popularity. What Kurlantzick does not elaborate is what a compelling promotion of our values might actually look like. The future he depicts seems ever more likely if the U.S. continues to tout its current brand of "democratization' in the Middle East.

Contemporary U.S. foreign policy rhetoric has done little to encourage increased dialogue with foreign publics, and much to drive the "resource nationalists" into each others company. Kurlantzick is right to call for more public diplomacy, yet it appears a rhetoric that credibly conveys the merits of American values has yet to be communicated.
 
Read Comments (0) | Add Your Own

- - -

Read Comments:

No comments for this entry.

- - -

Add a Comment:

Your Name:

Your Email:

Comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

NOTE: Your comment may not post immediately.

*
*
* Public Diplomacy Blog
* CPD Media Monitors
* CPD Announcements
* CPD in the News
* Past Media Reviews Archive
* RSS Feeds
* *
*

REGIONS
Africa
Americas
Asia Pacific
South Asia
Middle East
Europe


BLOGROLL
Abu Aardvark
Brand Horizons
Chasing the Flame
CMD PR Watch
CPD/FPA Election
Demos
DipNote
Diplo Foundation
Diplomacia Publica (Spain)
East West Views
FCO Bloggers:Global Conversations
Global Interdependence Initiative Switchblog
Institute for Cultural Diplomacy
John Brown’s Public Diplomacy Press and Blog Review
Julkisussdiplomatia
Kim Andrew Elliott
Layalina Review
Mountain Runner
Public Affairs (Germany)
Simon Anholt's Placeblog
The Language Business
Undiplomatic
Wandren PD
World Politics Review

- - -
- - -

Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

XML     

- - -
USC Center on Public Diplomacy logo Back to Top
USC Center on Public Diplomacy
Home | About the Center | Newsroom | Center Projects | Library | For Students
*
Search | Contact Us | Privacy Policy   ©2008 USC Center on Public Diplomacy. All rights reserved.